We usually think of growth as accumulation. We imagine becoming wiser, more capable, more aware by adding something to what we already know. We develop more insight, more understanding, and more clarity. While growth as accumulation is sometimes a useful model, the opposite—growth as loss—is a better match for our lived experience, and a more useful way of understanding it.
Growth occurs when something we once relied on no longer holds, when our way of navigating the world stops working, or when the story we have been living inside begins to fall apart. In these moments, life is not immediately better. Instead, we find ourselves faced with uncertainty, disorientation, and sometimes grief. This might mean that substance use becomes unmanageable, work becomes overwhelming, or cherished relationships fracture.
In these moments, we get a glimpse of how much of our stability depends on our stories and interpretations rather than direct contact with reality. What feels like loss is often the loosening of something—a story, an attachment, a belief—we did not realize we were relying on. In these moments, ideally we think about growth, but really what we are doing is letting go. And because letting go is painful, choosing to do it, over and over again, is a useful way of understanding what it means to be brave.
We often view self-deception as lying to ourselves, but few people believe they are lying to themselves, or can accurately identify the ways they do so. Even when it is apparent from the outside that self-deception is present, seeing it from the inside is difficult. Instead of calling it self-deception, a better understanding could be a collection of stories we use to organize reality. We carry stories about who we are, what other people are like, and how the world works. Our brains are storytelling, meaning-making systems, and we need them to navigate and make sense of the world.
The problem is not that we have stories, but that we forget they are stories. Over time, they stop feeling like interpretations and start feeling like reality itself. We assume that our view of ourselves is what we are, that our view of other people is simply what they are. We think our sense of how the world works is how the world works, rather than an interpretation.
These constructions are shaped by memory, identity, fear, desire, habit, and countless subtle biases. They are useful, but they are still constructions, persisting because they are useful. They stabilize us, preserve identity, and maintain coherence. They protect us from uncertainty. Each story we carry is doing psychological work, whether or not we see it.
One story may protect us from feeling inadequate, while another may protect us from feeling unlovable. One may protect us from feeling out of control, and another may protect us from the possibility that the life we have built is not aligned with what we actually value. Some stories are flattering. Some are painful. But all tend to organize experience in ways that make emotional life more manageable.
Self-deception is not really about ignorance, but about attachment to these stories. We do not merely believe our stories, we depend on them. When a self-deception begins to dissolve, what is happening is not just a correction of thought. A structure is collapsing. Something that once organized experience no longer does—and this is why moments of clarity often feel unsettling, even when they are beneficial.
If a person realizes they are not as competent as they believed, it is not just an information gain, but a loss of a story about competence that may have supported their sense of identity. A person who realizes they are more capable than they believed does not only gain confidence, but also loses a story that limited what they thought was possible. If we realize a relationship is not what we imagined, we do not only gain insight, but also lose a story about connection, stability, or love.
Even when the new understanding is more accurate, something is still lost, and that loss is painful. We can experience it as a form of death. This is why courage is required. We are not neutral toward the stories that structure our lives; we are attached to them. They make the world feel predictable and the self feel coherent. They allow us to move forward without constantly reassembling our understanding of everything. To see clearly, then, is not simply to acquire information. It is to become willing to lose the structures that make us feel oriented.
In this context, the first act of courage is not seeing something uncomfortable, but becoming willing to know at all. Most of us assume that we want truth, but in practice we often want stability more. To genuinely want to know means to accept, in advance, that what we discover may require us to give something up.
That willingness is already destabilizing. It opens the possibility that a cherished story may not be true, and just considering that possibility is enough to deter many people from the process. We are often unable to see differently because we remain so close to our existing interpretations, sensing—correctly—that seeing differently may change something important. Even more troubling, that important thing may be something we treasure about ourselves. We do not know in advance what will change, and that uncertainty is inherently unsettling.
When we do begin to look, the second act of courage begins. We encounter places where our stories do not fully match reality. We see inconsistencies, contradictions, or gaps. Sometimes these are small; sometimes they are large. In either case, the instinct is often to retreat, reinterpret, or smooth over what we have seen so that it fits more comfortably with what we already believe.
This is not a one-time event. Each time we see more clearly, something new becomes visible that we had not previously noticed. Each time a story falls away, another story reveals itself. The process does not end in a final state of perfect clarity. There is no point at which all stories disappear and reality is seen without interpretation. Instead, there is an ongoing movement between clarity and distortion, recognition and blindness, insight and reconstruction. Given this, bravery cannot be understood as a single act or moment of heroic confrontation. It is a continuous willingness to participate in this cycle without avoiding it.
A courageous life is a continuous attempt to live free of self-deception. A life in which we are increasingly willing to notice these stories, and increasingly willing to let go of them when they become visible. What remains is not certainty but a willingness to accept what is actually here.
In that sense, bravery is not the absence of illusion. It is the willingness to let illusion die again and again, without turning away from what replaces it.
Love,
Doc
This post was based on a quote from Pema Chodron, The essence of bravery is to live without self deception.
Forwarded this email? Sign-up here
See past posts here.