Embarrassment is the feeling of making a social mistake, it says I did something awkward. Guilt arises when we believe we have done something wrong; it says I did something bad. Healthy guilt can be useful. It points us toward making amends, repairing relationships, and changing our behavior. Shame is different, and goes deeper. It does not say, I did something wrong, but instead says something is wrong with me.
The idea that something is wrong with me is deeply uncomfortable, and so we seek to escape it. We subconsciously, automatically move away from it. Rather than feel shame, we push it away—we explain, justify or blame. We become defensive, we attack, or we distract ourselves, reaching for whatever helps us not sit with the feeling itself.
Actions can be changed. If we make a mistake, we can apologize, learn, and behave differently next time. But when the problem becomes who we are, the solution becomes much harder to see. If we believe we are fundamentally flawed, then any evidence of failure feels like confirmation of something we already fear to be true.
Parts of our nervous system do not distinguish between physical and emotional pain, and we do the same thing with uncomfortable emotions as we do with other types of pain, which is to make it go away. This response is useful when the threat is physical danger, but much less useful when the threat is an uncomfortable truth about ourselves. Given the discomfort, our nervous system seeks relief, and escape, and this can take many forms.
Addictive substances do more than create pleasure; they also offer relief. They quiet feelings that seem too overwhelming to experience, and offer temporary freedom from anxiety, loneliness, grief, fear, or shame. The substance often feels like the only available solution to an emotional experience that feels unbearable. If we lack the ability to sit with and examine shame, while possessing a nervous system that is wired to resolve distress quickly, then reaching for a chemical can feel less like a choice than the only solution we know. From the perspective of the nervous system, the goal is not truth—it is relief. If we have never learned another way to respond to shame, a chemical can seem like an entirely reasonable answer.
The same dynamic exists outside of addictive chemicals. Shame can become anger because anger feels more powerful, and safer, than vulnerability. It can become blame because blaming someone else allows us to avoid examining ourselves. It can become perfectionism because constantly striving feels easier than accepting that we may never achieve the feeling of being enough. It can become criticism and contempt because diminishing others temporarily protects us from feeling diminished ourselves.
These responses may look very different, but they share the fact that they are attempts to solve the problem of shame without actually having to feel it. In a direct analogy to using chemicals, these strategies often work in the short term, providing immediate relief. But again, in a way similar to using addictive chemicals, they do not address the core problem, and often deepen the very shame we are trying to escape. The person who lashes out in anger may later feel ashamed of how they behaved. The person who uses substances to escape pain may create consequences that generate even more pain. The person who constantly judges others may become increasingly isolated.
The original shame creates a coping strategy. The coping strategy creates new shame. The new shame strengthens the need for a coping strategy. The cycle continues.
There is another, equally devastating way that shame can control us. Rather than trying to move away from it, to escape it, we can believe it—we mistake it for truth. When shame says you are broken, we accept the verdict. When shame says you are awful and corrupt, we own it. Rather than run from these things, we allow them to become our conception of self. Shame can become self-fulfilling in this way. When we believe that we are fundamentally dishonest, unlovable, or destined to fail, those beliefs crystallize into an identity, an entire narrative. We then begin behaving in ways that confirm those beliefs or narratives. We act according to our identity. If I see myself as a kind person, kindness becomes natural. If I see myself as a failure, failure begins to feel inevitable. There can even be a strange sense of control in accepting shame's verdict. If we condemn ourselves first, no one else can surprise us with the accusation. We might call it brutal honesty, or a badge of honor; in fact, it is often another attempt to protect ourselves from vulnerability. If we are convinced we are broken, then acting accordingly can feel liberating, no longer struggling to become something else.
This acceptance of shame's story is particularly pernicious because it can be presented as sober honesty. Unlike other people, the speaker says, I have the courage and honesty to just say what is true: people are lazy, corrupt, or unlovable. But this is a defense mechanism, another way of avoiding the deeper work. Accepting shame's verdict feels easier than continuing to wrestle with the uncertainty of who we really are.
Groups of people, not just individuals, are capable of the same processes. Families, organizations, communities, and nations can all develop ways of avoiding painful realities. Collective shame can be just as powerful as individual shame.
The years following the First World War provide one of history's clearest examples. Germany experienced military defeat, economic devastation, and a profound sense of national humiliation. Those conditions did not inevitably lead to fascism; history is more complicated than that. But that shame created an environment in which movements that offered an escape from shame, by turning it outward, could become appealing. Instead of sitting with the painful reality of loss and failure, people were offered simpler explanations: someone to blame. Their suffering was not the result of a complicated human tragedy, but the fault of an external enemy. Shame is painful. Blame is relieving.
Just as individuals can try to escape shame and can believe shame, groups too can believe the story that shame tells, and take on that identity. This often disguises itself as honesty, presenting itself as realism, as a willingness to say what others are afraid to admit.
At a group level, if we begin to believe shame's story about who we are, shameful behavior can gradually become normalized. If shame leads us to believe that we are, by nature, corrupt, corruption is no longer a problem—it is simply the way things are. If we believe the story that shame tells us about our inadequacy, we begin organizing ourselves around that belief. In this way, shame does not just produce suffering, but also justification. When we cannot tolerate the possibility that we have failed, we become vulnerable to any story that protects our identity—even if that story requires us to deny reality, blame others, or justify harm.
Shame controls us two ways: trying to escape it, or believing it. The attraction of both external blame and self-condemnation is that they provide certainty. Shame is uncertain. It asks difficult questions. Blame and identity—even a negative identity—rush to answer them. Neither of these responses leads us to a good place.
A different response begins with a simple act of understanding. Instead of acting, explaining, believing, or defending, we pause long enough to notice what is happening. We acknowledge the feeling without rushing to obey it. We become curious about what lies beneath it, rather than accepting the story it tells about who we are.
That curiosity must be paired with compassion. Not because we deserve to be let off the hook, and not because our mistakes do not matter, but because harshness rarely leads to honesty. If looking inward feels like entering a courtroom, we will avoid it. If it feels like entering a place where the truth can be seen clearly, even when it is uncomfortable, we become much more willing to stay.
Ironically, this is where change becomes possible. Shame loses much of its power when it no longer has to be fought or hidden—but also does not have to be wholly believed. We begin to see that the feeling itself was never the greatest danger. The greater danger was everything we did to avoid feeling it.
We cannot stop shame from visiting us. We can, however, stop it from controlling us, from allowing it to quietly transform into an identity, an addiction, anger, blame, certainty, or contempt. We can learn to meet it directly, with honesty and kindness, and allow it to become what difficult emotions are often meant to be: not evidence that we are broken, but an invitation to understand ourselves more deeply.
Love,
Doc
Forwarded this email? Sign-up here
See past posts here.